Scan any page for the ADA/WCAG issues that are detectable in your code: missing alt text, unlabeled form fields, vague links, skipped headings, and more. Every finding maps to a specific WCAG criterion with a plain fix. An honest automated check, not a legal guarantee.
Free, no signup. We scan one live page for ADA/WCAG issues that are detectable in the code. Paste any public page URL.
An honest heads-up: This is an automated check of what can be detected from your code. It is not a legal guarantee or a full manual audit. Automated tools catch only part of all accessibility issues, so use this to find quick wins, not to prove compliance.
Accessibility lawsuits keep climbing, and most of the issues that trigger them are simple things buried in the HTML: an image with no alt text, a form field with no label, a "Click here" link a screen reader cannot make sense of. This tool reads your page and flags those problems, mapping each one to the exact WCAG success criterion it relates to, with a plain fix. It is honest about its limits: automated checks find common, code-detectable issues, not everything.
Deterministic, code-based checks parsed straight from your markup: images missing alt text (WCAG 1.1.1), form fields with no associated label (1.3.1 / 4.1.2), missing page language (3.1.1), a missing or empty title (2.4.2), a missing or duplicate h1 and skipped heading levels (1.3.1), empty or generic links and icon-only buttons (2.4.4 / 4.1.2), positive tabindex (2.4.3), and a missing skip-to-content link (2.4.1). Findings are grouped by impact (critical, serious, moderate).
Under the ADA, courts and the Department of Justice generally treat WCAG 2.1 Level AA as the standard for accessible websites, and thousands of demand letters and lawsuits go out every year, many over the exact issues above. Fixing them widens your audience, helps SEO (clean semantics and alt text are signals search engines use), and reduces legal exposure. But be clear-eyed: passing an automated scan is not the same as being compliant. Automated tools catch a portion of issues. The rest, like whether your alt text is actually meaningful or your page works fully by keyboard, needs a human.
Tools like accessiBe's accessScan and UserWay run a free scan and then push you toward a paid accessibility overlay widget. Those overlays do not fix your underlying code, and they have not stopped lawsuits. In 2025 the FTC fined accessiBe one million dollars for deceptive accessibility claims. Our checks are honest static checks mapped to WCAG with specific fixes, with no widget to sell you, no gated findings, and a clear label that this is an automated check, not legal advice.
<label for="id"> or an aria-label.alt="") is correct for purely decorative images, it tells screen readers to skip them. Only meaningful images need descriptive alt.We do full manual accessibility audits and remediate the code so your site actually meets WCAG, reducing your ADA-lawsuit exposure. Free starting review available.
Get a free review →Or call/text: (407) 694-2055The Pro service is a complete manual accessibility audit and we fix every issue, reducing your ADA-lawsuit exposure.
Get early access, book a free call →Paste any public page URL and the tool fetches that one page and reads its HTML. It runs nine deterministic, code-based checks against the WCAG standard: images missing alt text, form fields with no associated label, a missing page language, a missing or empty page title, a missing or duplicate h1 and skipped heading levels, empty or generic links and icon-only buttons, positive tabindex, and a missing skip-to-content link. Every finding is mapped to the specific WCAG success criterion it relates to, grouped by impact (critical, serious, moderate), and paired with a plain fix. You can copy the whole report for your developer.
The logic comes straight from WCAG 2.1, the standard U.S. courts and the Department of Justice generally treat as the benchmark for accessible websites. There is no widget to install and no score to game. The tool parses your markup and reports only what is actually in the code, so the same page returns the same findings every time.
Be clear about the limits: this is an automated check, not legal advice and not a full manual audit. Automated tools catch only a portion of accessibility issues, roughly a third to half. They cannot judge whether your alt text is meaningful, test real keyboard use, check color contrast in the rendered page, or confirm that dynamic content announces correctly. Treat a clean result as a floor, not a finish line. If you want every issue found and the code fixed, we do full manual audits and remediation, and you can request a free starting review.
No. A clean scan means none of the code-detectable checks flagged a problem on this page. Automated tools catch only part of all accessibility issues, so a clean result lowers your risk but does not prove compliance. Full compliance still needs a manual audit and real keyboard testing.
Overlay widgets do not fix your underlying code, and they have not stopped lawsuits. In 2025 the FTC fined the overlay vendor accessiBe one million dollars for deceptive accessibility claims. Real accessibility comes from fixing the markup itself, which is what these checks point you toward.